BestPromptFinder
Claim Verification and Evidence Grading
95Quality
92%Useful
81Reliability
The prompt
Audit the following claims before publication: CLAIMS: [paste] CONTEXT: [advertisement, deck, research report, website, etc.] JURISDICTION: [location] SUPPORTING SOURCES: [links/files] AS-OF DATE: [date] For each claim: 1. Rewrite it as one testable proposition. 2. Classify it: factual, comparative, forecast, opinion or implied promise. 3. Identify the best primary evidence and its date. 4. Assess evidence quality: strong, moderate, weak or absent. 5. Give a conclusion: supported, partly supported, unsupported, outdated or not independently verifiable. 6. State confidence and conflicting evidence. 7. Propose the narrowest accurate replacement wording. Pay special attention to "best," "largest," guaranteed returns, travel time, price, inventory, market share, performance and future-completion claims. Do not treat repetition across websites as independent corroboration. Never convert an estimate into a fact. End with a red-flag list requiring legal or subject-matter review.Find similar in the app →
Why this prompt
- Hand-picked, editorially reviewed prompt
- 92% found it useful across Claude, Gemini
Source
Related Research prompts
Evidence-Grade Property Market ResearchQuality 98 · Claude, GeminiCommercial Real-Estate Competitor Scoping
Quality 97 · GPT-5.6Competitor Benchmark Scorecard
Quality 97 · Claude, GeminiDecision-Grade Competitive Report
Quality 96 · GPT-5.6Institutional Article and Filing Extractor
Quality 95 · Gemini, GPT-5.6, ClaudeMarket Watch Monitor Design
Quality 92 · GPT-5.6 Sol