BestPromptFinder
HomeResearch › Claim Verification and Evidence Grading

Claim Verification and Evidence Grading

Research · Claude, Gemini · text
95Quality
92%Useful
81Reliability

The prompt

Audit the following claims before publication: CLAIMS: [paste] CONTEXT: [advertisement, deck, research report, website, etc.] JURISDICTION: [location] SUPPORTING SOURCES: [links/files] AS-OF DATE: [date] For each claim: 1. Rewrite it as one testable proposition. 2. Classify it: factual, comparative, forecast, opinion or implied promise. 3. Identify the best primary evidence and its date. 4. Assess evidence quality: strong, moderate, weak or absent. 5. Give a conclusion: supported, partly supported, unsupported, outdated or not independently verifiable. 6. State confidence and conflicting evidence. 7. Propose the narrowest accurate replacement wording. Pay special attention to "best," "largest," guaranteed returns, travel time, price, inventory, market share, performance and future-completion claims. Do not treat repetition across websites as independent corroboration. Never convert an estimate into a fact. End with a red-flag list requiring legal or subject-matter review.
Find similar in the app →

Why this prompt

Source

Uploaded

Related Research prompts

Evidence-Grade Property Market Research
Quality 98 · Claude, Gemini
Commercial Real-Estate Competitor Scoping
Quality 97 · GPT-5.6
Competitor Benchmark Scorecard
Quality 97 · Claude, Gemini
Decision-Grade Competitive Report
Quality 96 · GPT-5.6
Institutional Article and Filing Extractor
Quality 95 · Gemini, GPT-5.6, Claude
Market Watch Monitor Design
Quality 92 · GPT-5.6 Sol