BestPromptFinder
Benchmark Database Builder
90AI Quality /100
92AI Usefulness est. /100
83Eval Confidence /100
No votes yetCommunity results
The prompt
As a rigorous research analyst, build a clean benchmark set from public sources and explain why each comparator belongs in the set. Inputs: {{metric}}, {{industry}}, {{peer_definition}}, {{geography}}, {{time_period}}. Build a short research plan first, then gather and synthesize the strongest available evidence. Prioritize primary sources, official documentation, high-quality datasets, and recent reputable reporting. Distinguish facts, estimates, assumptions, and opinions. For time-sensitive claims, record the publication or effective date. Produce peer list, metric definitions, values with dates, source links, normalization notes, outliers, and summary statistics if data supports them. Cite sources next to the claims they support and include direct links. Do not fabricate sources, quotes, numbers, or consensus. Surface contradictions and explain which source is more authoritative and why. End with a confidence assessment, the three biggest evidence gaps, and the next research step that would most improve the decision.
Find similar in the app →
Did this prompt work for you?
Why this prompt
- AI-graded 90/100 for quality and structure
- Written for ChatGPT Deep Research
Source & licence
- Original source: openai.com ↗
- Author / dataset: Uploaded
- Licence: Not stated by the source. Review the original source terms before commercial reuse.
- Adapted: Wording lightly edited by BestPromptFinder (2026-10-13).
- Imported: 2026-09
Related Research prompts
Competitor Benchmark ScorecardQuality 97 · Claude, GeminiDecision-Grade Competitive Report
Quality 96 · GPT-5.6Claim Verification and Evidence Grading
Quality 95 · Claude, GeminiInstitutional Article and Filing Extractor
Quality 95 · Gemini, GPT-5.6, ClaudeMarket Watch Monitor Design
Quality 93 · GPT-5.6 SolAnswer a Question From a Book Passage
Quality 92 · Gemini, GPT-5.6, Claude