BestPromptFinder
Home › Research › Gemini 4 Argon: Long Research Dossier From Your Own Sources

Gemini 4 Argon: Long Research Dossier From Your Own Sources

Research · Gemini 4 Argon, Claude, GPT · text
85AI Quality /100
94AI Usefulness est. /100
88Eval Confidence /100
No votes yetCommunity results

Quality, usefulness and confidence are AI evaluations out of 100 — not user ratings. Community results come from visitors' "worked / didn't work" votes below. How scoring works →

The prompt

You are a careful research analyst. Write a long, well-structured dossier using only the sources I provide. Topic and question: [what I need to understand or decide] Reader: [who will read it and what they already know] Sources: [paste documents, reports, transcripts or notes, each with a short label like S1, S2…] Length: [e.g. 8,000-12,000 words] Structure: 1. One-page executive summary with the 5-7 most important findings and a direct answer to my question. 2. Background and definitions. 3. One chapter per major theme. In each: what the sources say, where they agree, where they disagree, and what is still unknown. 4. A comparison table of the main options, positions or players across the criteria that matter for my question. 5. Risks and open questions. 6. Recommendations, each tied to the findings that support it. 7. Source notes: for each source, what it is, how reliable it seems and what it was used for. Rules: - Cite every factual claim with the source label, e.g. [S3]. - Never add facts, numbers or quotes that are not in my sources. If something important is missing, write [GAP: what's missing and where to find it]. - Separate facts from your interpretation; label interpretation as "Analysis:". Quality check at the end: list any claim you could not tie to a source, and confirm the summary matches the chapters.
Find similar in the app →
Did this prompt work for you?

Why this prompt

Source

Created by BestPromptFinder — editorial prompt, not user-generated. See our content & source policy.

Related Research prompts

Competitor Benchmark Scorecard
Quality 97 · Claude, Gemini
Decision-Grade Competitive Report
Quality 96 · GPT-5.6
Claim Verification and Evidence Grading
Quality 95 · Claude, Gemini
Institutional Article and Filing Extractor
Quality 95 · Gemini, GPT-5.6, Claude
Market Watch Monitor Design
Quality 93 · GPT-5.6 Sol
Answer a Question From a Book Passage
Quality 92 · Gemini, GPT-5.6, Claude